Epistemología bayesiana

Adams, E. (1962). On rational betting systems. Archiv für mathematische Logik und Grundlagenforschung, 6, 7–29.

Allais, M. (1953). Le Comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque: Critique des postulates et axiomes de l’ecole Américaine. Econometrica, 21, 503–46.

Armendt, B. (1980). Is there a Dutch Book argument for probability kinematics? Philosophy of Science, 47, 583–588.

Armendt, B. (1992). Dutch strategies for diachronic rules: When believers see the sure loss coming. psa: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 1, 217–229.

Arntzenius, F. (2003). Some problems for conditionalization and reflection. The Journal of Philosophy, 100, 356–370.

Berker, S. (2013). Epistemic teleology and the separateness of propositions. Philosophical Review, 122, 337–93.

Bernoulli, J. (1713). Ars conjectandi. Basiliae.

Bjerring, J. C. y Skipper, M. (2022). Bayesianism for non-ideal agents. Erkenntnis, 87, 93-115.

Boole, G. (1952). On the application of the theory of probabilities to the question of the combination of testimonies or judgments. Studies in Logic and Probability, 308–85.

Bovens, L. y Hartmann, S. (2003). Bayesian epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bradley, R. (2007). Reaching a consensus. Social Choice and Welfare, 29, 609–32.

Brier, G. (1950). Verification of forecasts expressed in terms of probability. Monthly Weather Review, 78, 1–3.

Briggs, R. A. (2009). Distorted reflection. The Philosophical Review, 118, 59–85.

Briggs, R. A. (2019). Conditionals. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 543-590). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Briggs, R. A. y Pettigrew, R. (2020). An accuracy-dominance argument for Conditionalization. Noûs, 54(1), 162-181.

Buchak, L. (2013). Risk and rationality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Carnap, R. (1950). Logical foundations of probability. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carnap, R. (1962). Logical foundations of probability (2nd). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Carr, J. R. (2015). Don’t stop believing. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 45.

Carr, J. R. (2017). Epistemic utility theory and the aim of belief. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 95, 511–34.

Chihara, C. (1981). Quine and the confirmational paradoxes. En P. French, H. Wettstein, y T. Uehling (Eds.), Midwest studies in philosophy 6: Foundations of analytic philosophy (pp. 425–52). University of Minnesota Press.

Christensen, D. (1999). Measuring confirmation. The Journal of Philosophy, 96, 437–61.

Christensen, D. (2004). Putting logic in its place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Christensen, D. (2009). Disagreement as evidence: The epistemology of controversy. Philosophy Compass, 4, 756–67.

Christensen, D. y Lackey, J. (Eds.). (2013). The epistemology of disagreement: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Crupi, V. (2020). Confirmation. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2020). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Davies, M. (1998). Exernalism, architecturalism, and epistemic warrant. En C. Wright, B. Smith y C. Macdonald (Eds.), Knowing our own minds (pp. 321–61). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

de Finetti, B. (1937/1964). Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources. En H. E. Kyburg Jr y H. Smokler (Eds.), Studies in subjective probability (pp. 94–158). Originalmente publicado como “La prévision; ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives” en Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré, Volume 7, 1–68.

de Finetti, B. (1974). Theory of probability. New York: Wiley.

Dempster, A. P. (1966). New methods for reasoning towards posterior distributions based on sample data. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 37, 355–74.

Douven, I. (2012). The Lottery Paradox and the pragmatics of belief. Dialectica, 66, 351–73.

Dretske, F. (1970/2023). Operadores epistémicos (Alejandro Nogara, trad.) Disputatio, 26 (12): 71-89.

Earman, J. (1992). Bayes or bust? A critical examination of Bayesian confirmation theory. Cambridge, MA: The mit Press.

Easwaran, K. (2013). Expected accuracy supports conditionalization—and conglomerability and reflection. Philosophy of Science, 80, 119–142.

Easwaran, K. (2014). Regularity and hyperreal credences. Philosophical Review, 123, 1–41.

Easwaran, K. (2019). Conditional probabilities. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 131-198). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Easwaran, K., Fenton-Glynn, L., Hitchcock, C. y Velasco, J. D. (2016). Updating on the credences of others: Disagreement, agreement, and synergy. Philosophers’ Imprint, 16, 1–39.

Eells, E. (1982). Rational decision and causality. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eells, E. (1985). Problems of old evidence. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 66, 283–302.

Elga, A. (2000). Self-locating belief and the Sleeping Beauty problem. Analysis, 60, 143–7.

Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noûs, 41, 478–502.

Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. En L. M. Antony (Ed.), Philosophers without gods: Meditations on atheism and the secular life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fitelson, B. (2008). A decision procedure for probability calculus with applications. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 1, 111–125.

Fitelson, B. (2015). The strongest possible Lewisian triviality result. Thought, 4, 69–74.

Fitelson, B. y Hawthorne, J. (2010). How Bayesian confirmation theory handles the Paradox of the Ravens. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 284.

Foley, R. (1993). Working without a net. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Garber, D. (1983). Old evidence and logical omniscience in Bayesian confirmation theory. En J. Earman (Ed.), Testing scientific theories (Vol. 10, pp. 99–132). Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Gibbard, A. y Harper, W. (1978). Counterfactuals and two kinds of expected utility. En C. A. Hooker, J. L. Leach y E. F. McClennan (Eds.), Foundations and applications of decision theory (Vol. 13a, pp. 125–62). University of Western Ontario Series in Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Glymour, C. (1980). Theory and evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goodman, N. (1955/2004). Hecho, ficción y pronóstico. (Jorge Rodríguez Marqueze, trad.). Madrid: Síntesis.

Greaves, H. (2013). Epistemic decision theory. Mind, 122, 915–52.

Greaves, H. y Wallace, D. (2006). Justifying conditionalization: Conditionalization maximizes expected epistemic utility. Mind, 115, 607–632.

Hacking, I. (1967). Slightly more realistic personal probability. Philosophy of Science, 34, 311–325.

Hájek, A. (2003). What conditional probability could not be. Synthese, 137, 273–323.

Hájek, A. (2007). The reference class problem is your problem too. Synthese, 156, 563–85.

Hájek, A. (2009). Arguments for –or against– probabilism? En F. Huber y C. Schmidt-Petri (Eds.), Degrees of belief (Vol. 342, pp. 229–251). Synthese Library. Springer.

Hájek, A. (2011). Triviality pursuit. Topoi, 30, 3–15.

Harman, G. (1986). Change in view. Boston: The mit Press.

Hawthorne, J. y Fitelson, B. (2004). Re-solving irrelevant conjunction with probabilistic independence. Philosophy of Science, 71, 505–514.

Hempel, C. G. (1945/1979). Estudios sobre la lógica de la confirmación. En La explicación científica. Estudios sobre la filosofía de la ciencia. (pp. 13-59) (M. Frassineti de Gallo, Néstor Míguez e Irma Ruiz Aused, trads.). Barcelona: Paidós.

Henderson, L. (2013). Bayesianism and inference to the best explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 65, 687–715.

Hintikka, J. (1975). Impossible possible worlds vindicated. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 4, 475–84.

Hitchcock, C. R. (2012). Probabilistic causation. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012).

Holton, R. (2014). Intention as a model for belief. En M. Vargas y G. Yaffe (Eds.), Rational and social agency: The philosophy of Michael Bratman (pp. 12–37). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hosiasson-Lindenbaum, J. (1940). On confirmation. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 5, 133–48.

Howson, C. (1992). Dutch Book arguments and consistency. psa: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 2, 161–8.

Howson, C. y Urbach, P. (2006). Scientific reasoning: The Bayesian approach (3rd). Chicago: Open Court.

Huber, F. (2019). Ranking theory. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 397-436). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Huemer, M. (2011). Does probability theory refute coherentism? Journal of Philosophy, 108, 463–72.

Jaynes, E. T. (1957a). Information theory and statistical mechanics i. Physical Review, 106, 620–30.

Jaynes, E. T. (1957b). Information theory and statistical mechanics ii. Physical Review, 108, 171–90.

Jeffrey, R. C. (1965). The logic of decision (1st). McGraw-Hill series in probability and statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Joyce, J. M. (1998). A nonpragmatic vindication of probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 65, 575–603.

Joyce, J. M. (1999). The foundations of causal decision theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joyce, J. M. (2009). Accuracy and coherence: Prospects for an alethic epistemology of partial belief. En F. Huber y C. Schmidt-Petri (Eds.), Degrees of belief (Vol. 342, pp. 263–297). Synthese Library. Springer.

Kemeny, J. G. (1955). Fair bets and inductive probabilities. The Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 263–273.

Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933/1950). Foundations of the theory of probability. Translation edited by Nathan Morrison. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.

Konek, J. (2019). Comparative probabilities. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 267-348). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Kyburg, H. E., Jr. (1961). Probability and the logic of rational belief. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.

Laplace, P. S. (1814/1985). Ensayo filosófico de la teoría de probabilidades. (Pilar Castrillo, trad.). Madrid: Alianza Editorial.

Leitgeb, H. (2017). The stability of belief: How rational belief coheres with probability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Levi, I. (1987). The demons of decision. The Monist, 70, 193–211.

Lewis, D. (1971). Immodest inductive methods. Philosophy of Science, 38, 54–63.

Lewis, D. (1976). Probabilities of conditionals and conditional probabilities. The Philosophical Review, 85, 297–315.

Lewis, D. (1979). Attitudes de dicto and de se. The Philosophical Review, 88, 513–543.

Lewis, D. (1980). A subjectivist’s guide to objective chance. En R. C. Jeffrey (Ed.), Studies in inductive logic and probability (Vol. 2, pp. 263–294). Berkeley: University of California Press.

Lewis, D. (1981). Causal decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 59, 5–30.

Lin, H. y Kelly, K. T. (2012). A geo-logical solution to the Lottery Paradox. Synthese, 186, 531–75.

Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the best explanation (2nd). London: Routledge.

Littlejohn, C. (2018). Stop making sense? On a puzzle about rationality. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(2), 257–272.

Locke, J. (1689/1999). Ensayo sobre el entendimiento humano. (Edmundo O’Gorman, trad.). México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Maher, P. (1996). Subjective and objective confirmation. Philosophy of Science, 63, 149–74.

Maher, P. (2002). Joyce’s argument for probabilism. Philosophy of Science, 96, 73–81.

Mahtani, A. (2019). Imprecise probabilities. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 107-130). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Makinson, D. C. (1965). The paradox of the preface. Analysis, 25, 205–7.

Meacham, C. J. (2010). Two mistakes regarding the Principal Principle. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 407–31.

Meacham, C. J. (2016). Ur-priors, conditionalization, and ur-prior conditionalization. Ergo, 3(17), 444–492.

Meacham, C. J. y Weisberg, J. (2011). Representation theorems and the foundations of decision theory. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 89, 641–663.

Moss, S. (2018). Probabilistic knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Okasha, S. (2000). Van Fraassen’s critique of inference to the best explanation. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 691–710.

Olsson, E. (2017). Coherentist theories of epistemic justification. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Spring 2017). Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.

Pettigrew, R. (2013). A new epistemic utility argument for the Principal Principle. Episteme, 10, 19–35.

Pettigrew, R. (2014). Accuracy, risk, and the Principle of Indifference. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 90.

Pettigrew, R. (2016). Accuracy and the laws of credence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Predd, J., Seiringer, R., Lieb, E., Osherson, D., Poor, V., y Kulkarni, S. (2009). Probabilistic coherence and proper scoring rules. ieee Transactions on Information Theory, 55, 4786–4792.

Ramsey, F. P. (1926/2005). Verdad y probabilidad. En Obra filosófica completa. (pp. 156–198) (María José Frápolli, Francesc Camós y Javier Rodríguez Alcázar, trads.). Granada: Editorial Comares.

Rasmussen, M. y Steglich-Petersen, A. (eds.). (2019). Higher-order evidence: New essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reichenbach, H. (1956). The principle of common cause. En The direction of time (pp. 157–160). University of California Press.

Rosenkrantz, R. (1977). The paradoxes of confirmation. Synthese Library. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

Rosenkrantz, R. (1981). Foundations and applications of inductive probability. Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Press.

Russell, J., Hawthorne, J. y Buchak, L. (2015). Groupthink. Philosophical Studies, 172, 1287–1309.

Savage, L. J. (1954). The foundations of statistics. New York: Wiley.

Savage, L. J. (1967). Difficulties in the theory of personal probability. Philosophy of Science, 34, 305–310.

Schoenfield, M. (2014). Permission to believe: Why permissivism is true and what it tells us about irrelevant influences on belief. Noûs, 48, 193–218.

Seidenfeld, T. (1986). Entropy and uncertainty. Philosophy of Science, 53, 467–491.

Seidenfeld, T., Schervish, M. J. y Kadane, J. (2017). Non-conglomerability for countably additive measures that are not k-additive. The Review of Symbolic Logic, 10(2), 284-300.

Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Shimony, A. (1955). Coherence and the axioms of confirmation. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 20, 1–28.

Shimony, A. (1988). An Adamite derivation of the calculus of probability. En J. Fetzer (Ed.), Probability and causality (pp. 151–161). Dordrecht: Reidel.

Shogenji, T. (1999). Is coherence truth-conducive? Analysis, 59, 338–45.

Skyrms, B. (1987a). Coherence. En N. Rescher (Ed.), Scientific inquiry in philosophical perspective (pp. 225–42). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Skyrms, B. (1987b). Dynamic coherence and probability kinematics. Philosophy of Science, 54, 1–20.

Smithies, D. (2015). Ideal rationality and logical omniscience. Synthese, 192, 2769–93.

Spohn, W. (2012). The laws of belief: Ranking theory and its philosophical applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Suppes, P. (1974). Probabilistic metaphysics. Uppsala: University of Uppsala Press.

Swinburne, R. (1971). The paradoxes of confirmation: A survey. American Philosophical Quarterly, 8, 318–30.

Talbott, W. J. (1991). Two principles of Bayesian epistemology. Philosophical Studies, 62, 135–150.

Teller, P. (1973). Conditionalization and observation. Synthese, 26, 218–258.

Thoma, J. (2019). Decision theory. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 57-106). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

Titelbaum, M. G. (2013a). Quitting certainties: A Bayesian framework modeling degrees of belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Titelbaum, M. G. (2013b). Ten reasons to care about the Sleeping Beauty Problem. Philosophy Compass, 8, 1003–17.

Titelbaum, M. G. (2015). Rationality’s fixed point (or: In defense of right reason). En T. S. Gendler y J. Hawthorne (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 5, pp. 253–94). Oxford University Press.

Titelbaum, M. G. (2016). Self-locating credences. En A. Hájek y C. R. Hitchcock (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of probability and philosophy (pp. 666–680). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Titelbaum, M. G. (2022). Fundamentals of Bayesian epistemology. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

van Fraassen, B. C. (1983). Calibration: A frequency justification for personal probability. En R. Cohen y L. Laudan (Eds.), Physics, philosophy, and psychoanalysis (pp. 295–319). Dordrecht: Reidel.

van Fraassen, B. C. (1984). Belief and the will. The Journal of Philosophy, 81, 235–256.

van Fraassen, B. C. (1989). Laws and symmetry. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

von Mises, R. (1928/1946). Probabilidad, estadística y verdad. (Juan Carlos Grimberg, trad. Edición castellana del original en alemán Wahrscheinlichkeit, Statistik und Wahrheit.). Buenos Aires: Espasa-Calpe.

von Neumann, J. y Morgenstern, O. (1947). Theory of games and economic behavior (2nd). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Weirich, P. (2012). Causal decision theory. En E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Winter 2012).

Weisberg, J. (2007). Conditionalization, reflection, and self-knowledge. Philosophical Studies, 135, 179–197.

Weisberg, J. (2009). Locating ibe in the Bayesian framework. Synthese, 167, 125–44.

Wenmackers, S. (2019). Infinitesimal probabilities. En R. Pettigrew y J. Weisberg (eds.) (2019). Open handbook of formal epistemology (pp. 199-265). Ontario: PhilPapers Foundation.

White, R. (2005). Epistemic permissiveness. Philosophical Perspectives, 19, 445–459.

Williamson, T. (2007). How probable is an infinite sequence of heads? Analysis, 67, 173–80.

Wright, C. (2003). Some reflections on the acquisition of warrant by inference. En S. Nuccetelli (Ed.), New essays on semantic externalism. Cambridge, MA: mit Press.

Zynda, L. (1995). Old evidence and new theories. Philosophical Studies, 77, 67–95.

Zynda, L. (2000). Representation theorems and realism about degrees of belief. Philosophy of Science, 67, 45–69.